Far‐red solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been retrieved from multiple satellites with nearly continuous global coverage since 1996. Multiple official and research‐grade retrievals provide a means for cross validation across sensors and algorithms, but produces substantial variation across products due to differences in instrument characteristics and retrieval algorithm. The lack of a consistent, calibrated SIF dataset hampers scientific interpretation of planetary photosynthesis. NASA's OCO‐2 offers small sampling footprints, high data acquisition, and repeating spatially resolved targets at bio‐climatically diverse locations, providing a unique benchmark for spaceborne sensors traceable to ground data. We leverage overlap between the longer running GOME‐2 SIF time series, and more recent state‐of‐the‐art OCO‐2 and TROPOMI data, in a first attempt to reconcile inconsistencies in the long‐term record. After screening and correcting for key instrument differences (time‐of‐day, wavelength, sun‐sensor geometry, cloud effects, footprint area), we find that GOME‐2 and TROPOMI perform exceedingly well in capturing spatial, seasonal, and interannual variability across OCO‐2 targets. However, GOME‐2 retrieval methods differ by up to a factor of two in signal‐to‐noise and magnitude. Magnitude differences are largely attributed to retrieval window choice, with wider windows producing higher magnitudes. The assumed SIF spectral shape has negligible effect. Substantial research is needed to understand remaining sensitivities to atmospheric absorption and reflectance. We conclude that OCO‐2 and TROPOMI have opened up the possibility to produce a multi‐decadal SIF record with well characterized uncertainty and error quantification for overlapping instruments, enabling back‐calibration of previous instruments and production of a consistent, research‐grade, harmonized time series.